Is the paint pot or the paint tube better ,
wich would u recommend ?
Pot
http://www.maccosmetics.com/templates/pr...
Tubey Thing
http://www.maccosmetics.com/templates/pr...
please n thank u
To Anyone That Has Used M.A.C Paint !?
I like the tube better - easier to spread, I don't usually use it with a brush, so a pot is difficult, have to scoop it out and then put it on my finger. the tube just gives me more control.
Reply:I like the pot way better. Creamier, easier, better color payoff.
Reply:I like the Paint Pot better then the Paint Tube only because the tube can get soo messy. When you first open the tube up, so much of the paint is waisted; it just squirts out on it's own. Despite the fact that the tube is more hygenic and the pot has a better chance of trapping bacteria, I'd still choose the pot because it doesnt get wasted as much as the tube. Hope that helps.
Reply:The pot is easier.
Reply:the paint pots are quite thick, and give more of a matte colour, where are the paint pots have shimmer and shine, so it is all about your preferance.
Reply:Well, I have personally bought both.
Paint Tube
Pros: Stays on all day, nice color payoff, dries to a semi matte finish, good base for shadows and loose powders
Cons: May "leak" through your eyeshadows, very thick, dries up quickly
Paint Pot
Pros: Stays on all day, great color payoff, dries to a shimmery or matte finish, good base for everything, can be used as a shadow, does not dry out quickly, I went in the pool and it came out perfectly
Cons: May get contaminated if once you use dirty fingers,
So, I prefer the Paint Pot, because of the color selection and it does not dry out as fast or is as thick as paints!
Reply:Im using M.A.C Pot. It looks awsome and waterproof. Must have from M.A.C.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
M.A.C 'S blue lipstick?
Why do U think they made it and would U wear it .
http://www.maccosmetics.com/templates/pr...
M.A.C 'S blue lipstick?
Although MAC is high end, it is not top of the line, but they do like to play with funky colors. I actually bought a bunch of MAC the other day and the woman was telling me about the blue lipstick. They sent each store 10-15 tubes of it thinking that it would not sell, but in reality now there is a waiting list for people to buy it. I tried it on, and althoug it is not for me, it is a pretty color. It isnt electric blue or anything like that. It is a suble blue, almos silverish shimmer. It is very pretty for a night out on the town I just dont think it is a good shade to be wearing everyday of the week.
Reply:usually models wear that kind of stuff=] exotic things
Reply:I'm guessing they made it for the unique people/ fashion shows/ photo shoots. I would never ever wear it.
Reply:MAC is some high end stuff so they cover all ends of the rainbow. im pretty sure people who model/fashionistas buy it for the look.
i would wear it if i have an outfit matching it/going to a nice club (obviuosly for really crazy stuff) or modeling
Reply:I think they made it because everyone has different tastes. Some people would and some people wouldn't. But i personally wouldn't lol
Reply:I am Guessing they were high LOL or... REALLY wasted XD
Reply:because they knew that there are actually people out there who would wear it. and some ppl love mac so much that they think whatever they come up with is so in style..but eww i would never wear tht
Reply:thats hot
i would totally wear that!
Reply:actually M.A.C. actually started as photo shoot makeup, so a lot of the colors are not practical for every day use. But they eventually caught on that women like the heavy coverage of their makeup, so they began to market to the public. A lot of makeup artists still use M.A.C. on photo shoots and on the run way, so M.A.C. likes to keep all the options open so they can attract more buyers for their product. And I know a few people who wear crazy colors like blues and greens and yellows and hot pinks when they go out. I live in Los Angeles, so seeing someone with these colors is really not that strange to me. Give it a try, I bet you would actually enjoy playing around with such vivid color!
Reply:I wore blue lipstick occasionally in college. It's something you can get away with at the right time in your life, in the right environment, just for fun.
A lot of people hated it, but it was a blast wearing it.
http://www.maccosmetics.com/templates/pr...
M.A.C 'S blue lipstick?
Although MAC is high end, it is not top of the line, but they do like to play with funky colors. I actually bought a bunch of MAC the other day and the woman was telling me about the blue lipstick. They sent each store 10-15 tubes of it thinking that it would not sell, but in reality now there is a waiting list for people to buy it. I tried it on, and althoug it is not for me, it is a pretty color. It isnt electric blue or anything like that. It is a suble blue, almos silverish shimmer. It is very pretty for a night out on the town I just dont think it is a good shade to be wearing everyday of the week.
Reply:usually models wear that kind of stuff=] exotic things
Reply:I'm guessing they made it for the unique people/ fashion shows/ photo shoots. I would never ever wear it.
Reply:MAC is some high end stuff so they cover all ends of the rainbow. im pretty sure people who model/fashionistas buy it for the look.
i would wear it if i have an outfit matching it/going to a nice club (obviuosly for really crazy stuff) or modeling
Reply:I think they made it because everyone has different tastes. Some people would and some people wouldn't. But i personally wouldn't lol
Reply:I am Guessing they were high LOL or... REALLY wasted XD
Reply:because they knew that there are actually people out there who would wear it. and some ppl love mac so much that they think whatever they come up with is so in style..but eww i would never wear tht
Reply:thats hot
i would totally wear that!
Reply:actually M.A.C. actually started as photo shoot makeup, so a lot of the colors are not practical for every day use. But they eventually caught on that women like the heavy coverage of their makeup, so they began to market to the public. A lot of makeup artists still use M.A.C. on photo shoots and on the run way, so M.A.C. likes to keep all the options open so they can attract more buyers for their product. And I know a few people who wear crazy colors like blues and greens and yellows and hot pinks when they go out. I live in Los Angeles, so seeing someone with these colors is really not that strange to me. Give it a try, I bet you would actually enjoy playing around with such vivid color!
Reply:I wore blue lipstick occasionally in college. It's something you can get away with at the right time in your life, in the right environment, just for fun.
A lot of people hated it, but it was a blast wearing it.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
C++ inline class member functions?
When using the "inline" qualifier for class member functions, should the inline be specified in front of the function declaration, or the function definition, or both?
Also, can the definition of the function be in a separate .cpp or is it required to be in the .h file as is the case when defining templates?
Thank you for your assistance,
C++ inline class member functions?
Both. It all has to be in the header file. Because other code that will use it needs to know it's definition in order to actually put it inline (and other code will include your header, not your source file).
Here are two examples:
class A
{
inline void a();
}
inline void A::a()
{
// code for a
}
--or--
class A
{
inline void a()
{
// code for a
}
}
anemone
Also, can the definition of the function be in a separate .cpp or is it required to be in the .h file as is the case when defining templates?
Thank you for your assistance,
C++ inline class member functions?
Both. It all has to be in the header file. Because other code that will use it needs to know it's definition in order to actually put it inline (and other code will include your header, not your source file).
Here are two examples:
class A
{
inline void a();
}
inline void A::a()
{
// code for a
}
--or--
class A
{
inline void a()
{
// code for a
}
}
anemone
C++, What does this mean...?
DSI error LNK2005: "void __cdecl my_new_handler(void)" (?my_new_handler@@YAXXZ) already defined in qb.obj
i get this when im creating a class using templates and when i used it in my main class it causes this. there is one include for the main class and 1 poiter adn object created in the main class, other than that the class is a simple class with two friend classes.
C++, What does this mean...?
sounds to me like you already have declared my_new_handler( void ) somewhere else that's inadvertantly linking itself to your main class. Check your other files that you have attached to your main class to see if those files have my_new_handler( void ) declared. ie) in qp.obj, have you declared this particular class?
Hope this helps!
Reply:C++ Is a programing language. to be more specific it is an 'Object orientated programming language'
i get this when im creating a class using templates and when i used it in my main class it causes this. there is one include for the main class and 1 poiter adn object created in the main class, other than that the class is a simple class with two friend classes.
C++, What does this mean...?
sounds to me like you already have declared my_new_handler( void ) somewhere else that's inadvertantly linking itself to your main class. Check your other files that you have attached to your main class to see if those files have my_new_handler( void ) declared. ie) in qp.obj, have you declared this particular class?
Hope this helps!
Reply:C++ Is a programing language. to be more specific it is an 'Object orientated programming language'
Biology question?
before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule
a) acquires a pony tail
b) is released from the START signal on the template
c) becomes handicapted
d) stripped of it's introns
Biology question?
the answer is D
A. A Poly-A tail is added, not a pony tail
B. There is nothing attaching it to the START signal, if anything it would be detached from the STOP signal.
C. It becomes capped, not handicapped
D. Correct Answer, only exons leave the nucleus.
Reply:D only exons are left
Reply:Yours Answer is A
Because before leaving the nucleus though nuclear pores. First, a “cap” and a “tail” sequence are added to the ends of the mRNA.
and if u dont beleve me the n just type "before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule" in the Google Serach u will find. Okk??
Reply:your answer is "e"
d
Reply:The answer is "D"
because
Answer "A" is plain fake
Answer "B" is wrong- there is a signal that monitors the making of RNA, but START doesn't signal the protein to leave the nucleus.
Answer "C": The molecule is not handicapped in any way.
Answer D is the correct answer because introns stay in the nucleus. Exons do not. They leave the nucleus (think exit- exon) Introns are not needed anyway once the RNA leaves the nucleus.
a) acquires a pony tail
b) is released from the START signal on the template
c) becomes handicapted
d) stripped of it's introns
Biology question?
the answer is D
A. A Poly-A tail is added, not a pony tail
B. There is nothing attaching it to the START signal, if anything it would be detached from the STOP signal.
C. It becomes capped, not handicapped
D. Correct Answer, only exons leave the nucleus.
Reply:D only exons are left
Reply:Yours Answer is A
Because before leaving the nucleus though nuclear pores. First, a “cap” and a “tail” sequence are added to the ends of the mRNA.
and if u dont beleve me the n just type "before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule" in the Google Serach u will find. Okk??
Reply:your answer is "e"
d
Reply:The answer is "D"
because
Answer "A" is plain fake
Answer "B" is wrong- there is a signal that monitors the making of RNA, but START doesn't signal the protein to leave the nucleus.
Answer "C": The molecule is not handicapped in any way.
Answer D is the correct answer because introns stay in the nucleus. Exons do not. They leave the nucleus (think exit- exon) Introns are not needed anyway once the RNA leaves the nucleus.
Before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule...?
Before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule____________.
a) acquires a poly-A tail
b) breaks loose from the terminator signal on the template
c) becomes capped
d) is stripped of its introns
e) All of these
Before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule...?
I know that it acquires a poly-A-tail and the 5 prime cap.
so its probably E all of the above.
Reply:e
a) acquires a poly-A tail
b) breaks loose from the terminator signal on the template
c) becomes capped
d) is stripped of its introns
e) All of these
Before leaving the nucleus, the RNA molecule...?
I know that it acquires a poly-A-tail and the 5 prime cap.
so its probably E all of the above.
Reply:e
Problem with Microsoft Office 2007 Beta2 technical refresh?
I have Office 2007 beta, and my friend messed it up, when you open word, and try to insert a template it says:The Office Open XML file building blocks.dotx cannot be opened because there are problems with the contents.
You hit okay and it says: Word found unreadable content in "Building Blocks". Do you want to recover the the contents of the document? If you trust the source of this document, Click Yes. When you click yes I guess it restores the files, but if you click no it says:Word cannot open this document template. (C:\...\1033\Building Blocks.dotx. And if you clicked yes before and it restores the files, then when you quit is says: You have modified styles, building blocks, etc. (such as cover pages or headers), or other content that is stored in Template1. Do you want to save changes to template1? If you click yes it lets you save it under a file name, but if you open word again it does just the same thing again? What should I do I have uninstalled and reinstalled.Thatdidntwork
Problem with Microsoft Office 2007 Beta2 technical refresh?
Try This it works:
Close Word.
Go to your user building blocks directory (\Documents and Settings\%26lt;user name%26gt;\Application Data\Microsoft\Document Building Blocks on Windows XP, \users\%26lt;user name%26gt;\app data\roaming\\Microsoft\Document Building Blocks).
Go into any subdirectories and delete your Building Blocks.dotx file.
Reboot Word will regenerate the file for you.
Note If you had saved any building blocks into your Building Blocks.dotx file you should be OK.
Reply:Hi - the Docx Format is an Zip File rename it to zip. Uncompress your file and you see lot of xml file . in the word folder in zip file you can find your document.xml . edit it with and delete First line and write %26lt;Html%26gt; . delete last line and write %26lt;/html%26gt; email me if you cant do this Report It
Reply:erase Office-related files from your registry. By the way, if you don't want to alter the CORE of Windows, try OpenOffice.org. It has Writer (word processor), Calc (spreadsheet), Impress (presentations), Base (database), Math (formulas), and Draw (vector graphics). It works with Microsoft Office files, and it's free!
Reply:You could do that or replace the document with one from the installation. See the problem wiht Beta software is that it's still buggy as heck. It's going through end user beta testing and your a tester. Report the issue to Microsoft so they can fix it and reinstall it. They like screen shots too so they can see it, steps to reproduce(Details are VERY good) and any error information.
cyclamen
You hit okay and it says: Word found unreadable content in "Building Blocks". Do you want to recover the the contents of the document? If you trust the source of this document, Click Yes. When you click yes I guess it restores the files, but if you click no it says:Word cannot open this document template. (C:\...\1033\Building Blocks.dotx. And if you clicked yes before and it restores the files, then when you quit is says: You have modified styles, building blocks, etc. (such as cover pages or headers), or other content that is stored in Template1. Do you want to save changes to template1? If you click yes it lets you save it under a file name, but if you open word again it does just the same thing again? What should I do I have uninstalled and reinstalled.Thatdidntwork
Problem with Microsoft Office 2007 Beta2 technical refresh?
Try This it works:
Close Word.
Go to your user building blocks directory (\Documents and Settings\%26lt;user name%26gt;\Application Data\Microsoft\Document Building Blocks on Windows XP, \users\%26lt;user name%26gt;\app data\roaming\\Microsoft\Document Building Blocks).
Go into any subdirectories and delete your Building Blocks.dotx file.
Reboot Word will regenerate the file for you.
Note If you had saved any building blocks into your Building Blocks.dotx file you should be OK.
Reply:Hi - the Docx Format is an Zip File rename it to zip. Uncompress your file and you see lot of xml file . in the word folder in zip file you can find your document.xml . edit it with and delete First line and write %26lt;Html%26gt; . delete last line and write %26lt;/html%26gt; email me if you cant do this Report It
Reply:erase Office-related files from your registry. By the way, if you don't want to alter the CORE of Windows, try OpenOffice.org. It has Writer (word processor), Calc (spreadsheet), Impress (presentations), Base (database), Math (formulas), and Draw (vector graphics). It works with Microsoft Office files, and it's free!
Reply:You could do that or replace the document with one from the installation. See the problem wiht Beta software is that it's still buggy as heck. It's going through end user beta testing and your a tester. Report the issue to Microsoft so they can fix it and reinstall it. They like screen shots too so they can see it, steps to reproduce(Details are VERY good) and any error information.
cyclamen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)